{"id":3052,"date":"2009-11-17T11:43:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-17T11:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/379"},"modified":"2009-11-17T11:43:00","modified_gmt":"2009-11-17T11:43:00","slug":"claire-carlin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/claire-carlin\/","title":{"rendered":"Claire CARLIN"},"content":{"rendered":"
Victoria, Canada * <\/strong>ccarlin@uvic.ca <\/a>
<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
PR \u00e9m\u00e9rite * Universit\u00e9 de Victoria * Lettres XVIIe si\u00e8cle
<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n
Th\u00e9\u00e2tre, Mariage sous l’Ancien R\u00e9gime, Th\u00e9orie f\u00e9ministe <\/em><\/span><\/div>\n

\u00c9DITION CRITIQUE <\/strong>
– Pierre Corneille, La Veuve<\/em> et La Suivante<\/em>, in L. Picciola (dir.), Th\u00e9\u00e2tre complet<\/em>, Paris, Classiques Garnier, 2014. <\/span><\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n
OUVRAGES <\/strong>
– (dir.), Le Mariage sous l’Ancien R\u00e9gime,<\/em> Dalhousie French Studies, 56, automne 2001.
– Women Reading Corneille: Feminist Psychocriticisms of Le Cid,<\/em> New York, Peter Lang, 2000. <\/span><\/div>\n

ARTICLES<\/strong>
– \u00ab\u00a0Mise en contexte des Maximes du mariage<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb, in P. Dandrey, L. Norman\u00a0&N. Peacock (dir.), Moli\u00e8re 1663\u00a0: Comedy in Question\/La com\u00e9die \u00e0 la question<\/em>, num\u00e9ro sp\u00e9cial de\u00a0Le Nouveau Moli\u00e9riste<\/em>, XI, 2015, p. 107-123.<\/span><\/div>\n
– \u00ab Les chagrins du mariage : r\u00e9flexions sur une cat\u00e9gorie de topos \u00bb, in Fr. Lavocat (dir.), Le Mariage dans la fiction narrative avant 1800<\/em>, Louvain, \u00c9ditions Peeters, 2014, p. 399-416. <\/span><\/div>\n
– \u00ab\u00a0La femme battant son mari\u00a0: La mise en image d\u2019un topos<\/em> traditionnel\u00a0\u00bb, in L. Desjardins (dir.), Les Figures du monde renvers\u00e9 de la Renaissance aux Lumi\u00e8res<\/em>, Paris, \u00c9ditions Hermann, 2013, p. 297-311. <\/span><\/div>\n
– \u00ab\u00a0L’\u00e9pouse fugitive : Un topos<\/em> romanesque renouvel\u00e9 \u00e0 l’\u00e2ge de Louis XIV\u00a0\u00bb<\/a>, in\u00a0Rapport hommes\/femmes dans l’Europe Moderne: Figures et paradoxes de l’enfermement<\/em>, Institut de recherche sur la Renaissance, l’Age Classique, et les Lumi\u00e8res (IRCL), Universit\u00e9 de Montpellier 3,\u00a0Archives Ouvertes de HALSHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9), 2013.\u00a0 <\/span><\/div>\n
– \u00ab\u00a0Une curiosit\u00e9 vaine et indiscr\u00e8te\u00a0\u00bb\u00a0: Le mariage au carrefour de la vie priv\u00e9e et de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat public\u00a0\u00bb, in A.Walch (dir.), La M\u00e9diatisation de la vie priv\u00e9e, XVe-XXe si\u00e8cle<\/em>, Arras, Presses de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 d\u2019Artois, 2012, p. 152-162.<\/span><\/div>\n
– \u00ab\u00a0L\u2019\u00e9pouse affam\u00e9e\u00a0\u00bb<\/a> in L\u2019Image r\u00e9p\u00e9t\u00e9e\u00a0: Imitation, copie, remploi, recyclage<\/em>, num\u00e9ro sp\u00e9cial de la revue en ligne Textimage\u00a0: Le conf\u00e9rencier<\/em>, automne 2012. <\/span><\/div>\n
– \u00ab Fran\u00e7ois de Sales et le discours sur le mariage des corps au XVIIe si\u00e8cle \u00bb<\/a>, GRAC – Groupe Renaissance et Age Classique (Universit\u00e9 Lumi\u00e8re Lyon 2), en ligne.
– \u00ab Perfect Harmony : Love and Marriage in Early Modern Pegagogy \u00bb, in A. M. Birberick (dir.), The Art of Instruction : Essays on Pedagogy and Literature in 17th-Century France<\/em>, Amsterdam, Rodopi, 2008, p. 201-224.
– \u00ab Jeanne de Cambry : Mystic and Marriage Counselor \u00bb, in T. Carr (dir.), The Cloister and the World : Early Modern Convent Voices <\/em>(EMF 11<\/em>, Rookwood Press), 2007, p. 113-129.
– \u00ab Modernit\u00e9s de l\u2019imaginaire nuptial : anatomies du mariage \u00bb, in Wm. Brooks & R. Zaiser (dir.), Religion, Ethics, and Hisotry in the French Long Seventeenth Century \/ La Religion, la morale et l\u2019hisotire \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e2ge classique<\/em>, Oxford, Peter Lang, 2007, p. 91-116.
– \u00ab Charles Sorel arbitre de l’amiti\u00e9 tendre \u00bb, in E. Bury & E. Van der Schueren (dir.), Charles Sorel dans tous ses \u00e9tats<\/em>, Qu\u00e9bec, PU Laval, 2006, p. 453-62.
– \u00abDrawing Knowledge from Information: Early Modern Texts on the TAPoR Platform\u00bb, Text Technology, <\/em>1, 2005,p. 13-20 (description d’une base de textes et d’images sur le mariage sous l’Ancien R\u00e9gime)<\/em>.
– \u00abLa nuit du couple: la dissolution du mariage dans l’imaginaire des XVIe et XVIIe si\u00e8cles\u00bb, in D. Bertrand (dir.), Penser la nuit (XVe-XVIIe si\u00e8cle),<\/em> Paris, H. Champion, 2003, p.505-523.
– \u00abCrime et ch\u00e2timent: l’adult\u00e8re dans quelques trait\u00e9s catholiques du XVIIe si\u00e8cle\u00bb, in R. Crescenzo, M. Roig-Miranda & V. Zaercher (dir.), Le Mariage en Europe, XVIe-XVIIIe si\u00e8cles,<\/em> Nancy, PU de Nancy, 2003, p. 173-215.
– \u00abThe Staging of Impotence: France’s Last congr\u00e8s\u00bb, in C. Carlin & K. Wine (dir.), Theatrum mundi: Studies in Honor of Ronald W. Tobin<\/em>, Charlottesville (Virginie), Rookwood Press, 2003, p.102-112.
– \u00abLe Miroir du mariage: La m\u00e9taphore dans quelques trait\u00e9s catholiques du XVIIe si\u00e8cle\u00bb, Biblio 17,<\/em> 145, 2003 (\u00abLa Spiritualit\u00e9\/L’\u00c9pistolaire\/Le Merveilleux\u00bb), p.95-109.
– \u00abMisogamie et misogynie dans les complaintes des mal mari\u00e9s au XVIIe si\u00e8cle\u00bb, Biblio 17<\/em>, 138, 2002 (\u00abLa Femme au XVIIe si\u00e8cle\u00bb), p.365-378.
– \u00abPr\u00e9ciosit\u00e9 et th\u00e9ologie: l’amour conjugal dans Cl\u00e9lie <\/em>et dans quelques trait\u00e9s catholiques sur le mariage\u00bb, in D. Denis & A.-E. Spica (dir.), Madeleine de Scud\u00e9ry: une femme de lettres au XVIIe si\u00e8cle,<\/em> Arras, Artois PU, 2002, p.141-153.
– \u00abLes Soeurs Mancini en M\u00e9diterran\u00e9e\u00bb, Biblio 17,<\/em> 137, 2002 (\u00abLes M\u00e9diterran\u00e9es au XVIIe si\u00e8cle\u00bb), p.321-335.
– \u00abTransforming the Myth of Marriage in Early Modern France\u00bb, in Attending to Early Modern Wome: Gender, Culture and Change,<\/em> University of Delaware Press, 2002, p.105-107.
– \u00abG\u00e9rer son mariage au XVIIe si\u00e8cle: l’exemple de Jeanne de Schomberg\u00bb, Dalhousie French Studies,<\/em> fall 2001, 91-97.
– \u00abImagining Marriage in the 1690s.\u00bb, Papers on French Seventeenth-Century Literature<\/em>, 54, 2001, p.167-176.
– \u00abMis\u00e8res et \u00e9pines dans la for\u00eat nuptiale au tournant du si\u00e8cle\u00bb, in P. Desan (dir.), D’un si\u00e8cle \u00e0 l’autre,<\/em> Fasano, Schena, 2001, p.93-116.
– \u00abChim\u00e8ne et Ph\u00e8dre m\u00e9lancoliques\u00bb, Papers on French Seventeenth-Century Literature<\/em>, 52, 2000, p.163-75.
– \u00abLe “parler femme” dans La Pr\u00e9tieuse <\/em>de Michel de Pure\u00bb, Actes de l’atelier 7 (APFUCC)<\/em>, PU de Guelph, 1991, p.3-18.
– \u00abThe Woman as Heavy: Female Villains in the Theatre of Pierre Corneille\u00bb, French Review<\/em>, 59, fev. 1986, p.389-98.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Victoria, Canada * ccarlin@uvic.ca PR \u00e9m\u00e9rite * Universit\u00e9 de Victoria * Lettres XVIIe si\u00e8cle \u00a0 Th\u00e9\u00e2tre, Mariage sous l’Ancien R\u00e9gime, Th\u00e9orie f\u00e9ministe \u00c9DITION CRITIQUE – Pierre Corneille, La Veuve et La Suivante, in L. Picciola (dir.), Th\u00e9\u00e2tre complet, Paris, Classiques Garnier, 2014. \u00a0 OUVRAGES – (dir.), Le Mariage sous l’Ancien R\u00e9gime, Dalhousie French Studies, 56, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1933,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,5],"tags":[],"categorie_personnage":[],"class_list":["post-3052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-non-classe","category-repertoire"],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"3.0.0","language":"gb","enabled_languages":["fr","gb"],"languages":{"fr":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"gb":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false}}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3052\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1933"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3052"},{"taxonomy":"categorie_personnage","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categorie_personnage?post=3052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}