{"id":2884,"date":"2009-09-17T18:52:24","date_gmt":"2009-09-17T18:52:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/213"},"modified":"2009-09-17T18:52:24","modified_gmt":"2009-09-17T18:52:24","slug":"rapports-des-sexes-et-systemes-d-alliance-denominations-humaines-et-stereotypes-sociaux-dans-les-nouvelles-de-marguerite-de-navarre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/rapports-des-sexes-et-systemes-d-alliance-denominations-humaines-et-stereotypes-sociaux-dans-les-nouvelles-de-marguerite-de-navarre\/","title":{"rendered":"Rapports des sexes et syst\u00e8mes d’alliance : d\u00e9nominations humaines et st\u00e9r\u00e9otypes sociaux dans les nouvelles de Marguerite de Navarre"},"content":{"rendered":"
Emilie DEVRIENDT<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Thèse en Littérature – Dir. Mireille Huchon, Université de Paris IV – Sorbonne, 9 décembre 2006.
\n<\/span><\/strong>
\nSoutenance de thèse d’Emilie Devriendt – Paris IV (1, rue Victor Cousin, 75 005 Paris), amphithéâtre Chasles, 14h00.<\/p>\n

Le jury était composé de Mme Mireille Huchon (Paris IV), de Mme Eva Buchi (ATILF-CNRS\/Nancy II), M. Jean-Pierre Chambon (Paris IV), M. Salvatore D’Onofrio (Palerme) et M. Jean Lecointe (Poitiers).<\/span><\/div>\n


\nCette étude décrit l’Heptaméron comme un document ethnographique, pour dégager la signification des représentations sociales qu’il construit. La première partie étudie les principales dénominations humaines sous la forme de monographies sémantiques réparties par champs, correspondant aux principales institutions sociales représentées dans le recueil : genre, statuts sociaux (noblesse), hiérarchie domestique, amitié, amour, mariage, parenté (réelle ou symbolique). Chaque monographie est suivie d’un choix de variantes et d’une synthèse lexicographique. La seconde partie s’attache aux mots envisagés par paires dont l’examen est regroupé en fonction des rapports de sexes : sont étudiées les relations féminines, masculines, et mixtes. On y montre comment les catégorisations relationnelles peuvent être articulées à des systèmes d’attitudes stéréotypiques illustrant la primauté structurale d’un concept d’alliance élargi.<\/span><\/div>\n

\nTitre anglais :<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n

\nSocial patterns and gendered anthropology in Marguerite de Navarre’s Heptameron: cultural and semantic issues.<\/span><\/div>\n

\nRésumé en anglais :<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n

\nAssuming the Heptameron can be studied as an ethnographic document, we focus on interpreting the social representations it constructs. In the first part, human denominations are analyzed and classified as part of the main social structures represented in the text: gender, nobility, domestic hierarchy, marriage, affinity, kinship, pseudo-kinship, friendship, love. Each word monograph is completed by a selection of variants and a lexicographical synthesis including references to Early Modern dictionaries and contemporary ones. The second part addresses the issue of social roles and practices analyzing how men and women are categorized through the narratives, in order to describe female, male, and male\/female relationships and behaviors. Our point is that a widened concept of alliance can account for most of the social patterns designed through the text.<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Emilie DEVRIENDT Thèse en Littérature – Dir. Mireille Huchon, Université de Paris IV – Sorbonne, 9 décembre 2006. Soutenance de thèse d’Emilie Devriendt – Paris IV (1, rue Victor Cousin, 75 005 Paris), amphithéâtre Chasles, 14h00. Le jury était composé de Mme Mireille Huchon (Paris IV), de Mme Eva Buchi (ATILF-CNRS\/Nancy II), M. Jean-Pierre Chambon […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"categorie_personnage":[],"class_list":["post-2884","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-debats"],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"3.0.0","language":"gb","enabled_languages":["fr","gb"],"languages":{"fr":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"gb":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false}}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2884","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2884"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2884\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2884"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2884"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2884"},{"taxonomy":"categorie_personnage","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categorie_personnage?post=2884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}