{"id":2046,"date":"2024-09-18T17:03:02","date_gmt":"2024-09-18T17:03:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/20030"},"modified":"2024-09-18T17:03:02","modified_gmt":"2024-09-18T17:03:02","slug":"nos-adhrent-e-s-publient_30","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/nos-adhrent-e-s-publient_30\/","title":{"rendered":"Nos adh\u00e9rent-e-s publient"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/em><\/p>\n

SVEC<\/i>, <\/i>2009, Oxford, Voltaire
\nFoundation, 1? xiv + 378p., 12 ill., \u00ab 65 \/ \u00bb75 (hors taxe) \/ $110, ISBN
\n978 0 7294 0955<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
In this interdisciplinary study, Trouille closely
\nexamines a wide range of texts on spousal abuse to show how lawyers and
\nnovelists adopted each other’s rhetorical strategies to present
\ncompeting versions of the truth. These texts brought the traditionally
\nprivate matter of wife-abuse into the public arena, and consequently
\nserved as an impetus for legal reform in the early years of the French
\nRevolution.<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
Part I. Socio-historical and legal contexts<\/b><\/i><\/span><\/i><\/div>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/b><\/i><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n


\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Introduction: Scorned, battered and bruised: marriage
\nand wife-abuse in eighteenth-century French fiction and society<\/span><\/div>\n
1. Moderate correction, rule of thumb: the norms of spousal abuse in eighteenth-century France<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
Part II. Wife-abuse in the courts: separation
\ncases from Des Essart’s Causes c\u00e9l\u00e8bres’ and Bellart’s ?M\u00e9moires’<\/b> <\/i><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/b><\/i>
<\/span><\/div>\n
2. For better or worse? Veneral disease as grounds for
\nmarital separation in the case of Mme Bl\u00e9 (Reims, 1757 and Paris, 1771)<\/span><\/div>\n
3. A victim of her own naivety? The separation suit of
\nthe marquise de M\u00e9zi\u00e8res (Paris, 1775)<\/span><\/div>\n
4. Battered wife or clever opportunist’ The separation case of Mme Rouches (Toulouse, 1782)<\/span><\/div>\n
5. Challenging male violence and the double standard in
\nthe courts: the separation case of Mme Aubailly de La Berge (Paris,
\n1788)<\/span><\/div>\n
6. Bellart’s critique of the 1792 divorce law in his
\ndefence of Mme de L’Orme (Paris, 1803) and M. Mandonnet (Troyes, 1805)<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
Part III. Wife-abuse in eighteenth-century French fiction<\/i> <\/b><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/i><\/b>
<\/span><\/div>\n
7. ?Until death do us part’: fact and fiction in Sade’sMarquise de Gange<\/span><\/div>\n
8. Buried alive: Genlis’s Gothic tale of marital
\nviolence in ?Histoire de la duchesse de C***’<\/span><\/div>\n
9. Truth stranger than fiction: wife-abuse in R\u00e9tif de la Bretonne’sIng\u00e9nue Saxancour<\/span><\/div>\n
Conclusion: Intersections of literature, law and life experience in accounts of wife-abuse<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/strong><\/span>http:\/\/www.voltaire.ox.ac.uk<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/a>email@voltaire.ox.ac.uk<\/a><\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/b><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

SVEC, 2009, Oxford, Voltaire Foundation, 1? xiv + 378p., 12 ill., \u00ab 65 \/ \u00bb75 (hors taxe) \/ $110, ISBN 978 0 7294 0955 In this interdisciplinary study, Trouille closely examines a wide range of texts on spousal abuse to show how lawyers and novelists adopted each other’s rhetorical strategies to present competing versions of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1257,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,10],"tags":[],"categorie_personnage":[],"class_list":["post-2046","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-actualites","category-dernieres-parutions"],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"3.0.0","language":"gb","enabled_languages":["fr","gb"],"languages":{"fr":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"gb":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false}}},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2046","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2046"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2046\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2046"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2046"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2046"},{"taxonomy":"categorie_personnage","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/siefar.org\/gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categorie_personnage?post=2046"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}